Good Hands Makes Sustainability and Reliability a Sure Thing
by Michael Kuppinger P.E.
Sunny Puri PE, LEED AP
November 1, 2009
|
|
|
Table
1. PUE at three different times in the building's life. |
|
Three green design principles position Allstate for the Gold
Employing
sustainable strategies is second nature for today’s commercial and
institutional buildings, but as tomorrow’s data centers search for
reliable ways to color themselves green, finding the right balance
between initial capital cost (CAPX) and operating cost (OPX) without
sacrificing reliability, will be key. The answer is three-fold.
Efficient data centers must balance the
following design principals like a three-legged stool: the use of
modeling tools, specifying efficient IT equipment, and employing
energy-saving techniques to find the right formula for each facility.
Allstate Insurance Co.’s new 52,000-square
foot (sq.ft.) flagship greenfield data center, located just 80 miles
from its Northbrook, IL, headquarters went “live” in May with
approximately 14,000 sq. ft. of raised floor computer room space,
including racks operating at 18 kilowatts (kW). The data center was
designed with balance in mind, which helped the nation’s largest
publicly-held personal lines insurer decrease its own energy usage by
70 percent over its previous data centers and reach a power
utilization effectiveness (PUE) of 1.39. LEED Gold certification is
pending.
Modeling Tools
While
an experienced engineer is surely skilled to optimize individual MEP
systems performance, complete infrastructure optimization is best
done through the integration of both modeling tools and field
experience. From building information modeling (BIM) to computational
fluid dynamics (CFD) and energy modeling, each building system has a
software tool that can assist engineers in realizing previously
unreachable design goals.
Initially used by
architects and structural engineers in building design, BIM software
has recently made significant strides in MEP systems modeling that
help conserve materials and avoid conflicts prior to construction,
directly reducing the project’s overall carbon footprint. CFD
modeling indicates the effectiveness of air flow and heat transfer in
the data center space, therefore optimizing cooling performance by
adjusting IT and mechanical equipment layout appropriately.
Leading energy modeling tools include
Integrated Environmental Solutions Limited (IES, www.iesve.com) and
Carrier’s Hourly Analysis Program (HAP,
www.commercial.carrier.com). IES assists engineers in analyzing
energy modeling through visualization, weighing the benefits and cost
effectiveness of different sustainable strategies. For example,
daylighting may be a positive way to bring natural light into a
facility, but it may also add to heat gain in the space, which will
require more from the mechanical systems. IES software will determine
the viability of these types of strategies. A full energy model like
HAP is required by LEED for certification and brings the big picture
together so that the individually optimized systems can be further
optimized as a whole, comparing all sustainable strategies within the
data center and creating a benchmark.
Initially,
it was determined that the mechanical systems in Allstate’s data
center would reach optimal efficiency with two 900-ton chillers
running at partial load. However, the energy model found that a
smaller chiller scheme was ideal for the application after these data
were entered along with data about electrical demand. As a result,
two 450-ton chillers share the cooling load equally and a third sits
idle until the others reach their capacity. This cut the building’s
overall electrical consumption significantly, especially during
partial loading conditions. The three smaller chillers totaling 1350
tons of capacity will cost more up front than two chillers with a
total of 1800 tons of capacity, but the OPX and energy savings easily
provided for a short ROI of two years (while gaining other
reliability benefits like faster restart times as well. For Allstate,
doing something that was not intuitive for the optimization of one
system in turn raised the overall efficiency of the system as a
whole, thanks to full energy modeling.
Modeling
tools helped Allstate achieve a lower PUE than its competitors, too.
While comparable data centers industry-wide operate at typical PUE
values between 1.6 and 3.0, Allstate’s data center average PUE
measures 1.39 with a full real-time load at 66 F outside air
temperatures (see the table). PUE rose to 1.46 when outside
temperatures reached 77 F and is expected to fall below 1.32 when
outside temperatures drop during Chicago’s fall, winter, and spring
months, in large part due to efficient operation of the facility’s
waterside economizers.
ESD used each of
these tools while designing Allstate’s data center, yet it was the
combination of the energy modeling and the experienced engineering
skills that allowed the facility’s electrical and mechanical
systems and their predicted energy savings to became a reality in the
field, as modeled. For many facilities, this doesn’t happen. While
modeling tools can simulate field conditions, the gap between reality
and simulation continues to live on.
Efficient IT Equipment
While
PUE measures MEP equipment effectiveness, IT equipment efficiency
also plays a role in the overall sustainability of a data center, as
reducing total energy consumption is the ultimate goal. It’s known
that trimming as little as 1 kW at the load level (IT cabinet) can
translate to an energy savings of as high as 2.8 kW at the utility
level. This is achieved by specifying efficient IT equipment that
requires less energy to perform each task. By directly lowering the
electrical demand at the equipment portal, the energy savings
trickles down to lower the mechanical equipment demand as well. This
cascading effect means less overall mechanical and electrical losses.
These efficiency benefits are often in addition to that of the PUE
calculations but still make a significant difference in total energy
expenditure.
Specifying higher-efficiency
power supplies with Energy Star ratings and higher-performance
processors are just two of the ways Allstate achieved the cascading
effect for its data center. Using an ESD-custom load-profile modeling
program, ESD assisted Allstate in analyzing the effect of deploying
virtualized servers, furthering efficiency gains across the data
center.
Virtualization of Allstate’s data
center eliminated hundreds of smaller less efficient servers in
exchange for larger, more efficient servers running multiple
applications simultaneously and with optimized power supplies. With
aggressive application to server ratio, these servers eliminate idle
time and support everything from Allstate’s email system to special
software created for their insurance programs. The virtualized
servers also provided the right environment for high-density
mechanical and electrical systems.
Energy-Saving Techniques
While
modeling and efficient equipment have natural limitations, the use of
energy-saving techniques is as vast as current technology and
innovation. Tweaking equipment setpoints and employing free cooling,
heat recovery, and monitoring systems and equipment all provide a
typical data center with the opportunity to be green.
Possibly the greatest way to promote data
center efficiency over time is the use of proper measurement and
verification tools. Achieving the LEED certification credit for
Measurement and Verification can affect a data center’s bottom line
by maintaining efficiencies through the monitoring of systems and
their equipment. While individual systems are typically monitored
independently, overall efficiency can be maximized with the use of a
building automation system (BAS) and or an electrical power
monitoring system (EPMS). With tools like these, when system
components suddenly fall outside of their desired energy usage range.
In order to collect real-time data facility
wide, Allstate’s data center employs a consolidated BAS and EPMS
system that takes measurements from all points in the system all the
way down to the cabinet level and brings them back to one interface.
Monitoring this information in real-time allows facilities personnel
to maintain efficiency as designed and pinpoint minor issues
momentarily.
Because cooling alone can
represent as much as 50 percent of a data center’s total energy
expenditure, significant efficiency gains can be realized by
optimizing a data center’s HVAC operation. Allstate’s critical
facility did this in a number of ways.
First,
running redundancy with the fluid coolers, or using all three instead
of two with one sitting idle, also allowed Allstate to take advantage
of an extra 50 percent heat rejection surface area. Because of this,
the variable-frequency drives on the fluid cooler fans were able to
slow down considerably to meet the load, resulting in a significant
energy savings. Furthermore, implementing this running redundancy on
the fluid cooler side drastically reduced, the pressure drop through
the condenser water critical flow path saving pumping horsepower.
When taking the design condenser water flow for two fluid coolers and
spreading it out between all three, the pressure drop through each
fluid cooler was cut by more than half. The energy savings realized
here is actually doubled because the same running redundancy
philosophy was used on the condenser water pumps for reliability
benefits. Third, since the fluid coolers now reject more heat from
the system, they are able to perform with a tighter condenser water
approach to ambient conditions by a few degrees, resulting in
additional hours of free cooling.
Techniques
such as free cooling and heat recovery have been commonly used in
commercial facilities for years and are also now applicable to the
data center environment. For example, during Chicago’s winter
months Allstate’s data center will use its chillers only as needed.
With cold enough ambient temperatures, the fluid coolers are able to
produce chilled water with very little horsepower, achieving free
cooling and completely bypassing the chillers with a plate-and-frame
heat exchanger. Heat recovery was also used by extracting heat from
the computer room floor and battery rooms and reusing it to heat the
facility’s office spaces and the “back of the house”
infrastructure rooms where the UPS, switchgear, and HVAC equipment
are housed.
While none of the above-mentioned
design principals are especially unique when standing alone, they
created a new benchmark for green data centers when they rose
together. The balance and accumulation of these choices positions
Allstate’s data center to be one of the first LEED Gold-certified
mission critical facilities, balancing its unique, one-of-a-kind
accomplishments on sustainable legs of its own.
Sidebar: PUE: A True Measure Of Data Center Efficiency?
By
Steven A. MonfortonPower
utilization effectiveness (PUE) is a good indicator of MEP systems
efficiency, but doesn’t capture the data center’s true energy
performance because it fails to incorporate IT equipment expenditure.
Here is the traditional equation: PUE
=
(total facility power/IT equipment power) It
is essential to consider the data center as a whole in order to
optimize it, as IT equipment effectiveness up front can further
optimize mechanical and electrical systems. Instead, an equation
that, for example, considers total energy consumed, as well as other
important IT-related factors including equipment placement
strategies, air flow, virtualization, and the IT equipment itself
could have a much greater impact on overall efficiency. Perhaps a
more appropriate metric to consider would be corporate average data
center efficiency (CADE), which is used to measure the overall energy
efficiency of an organization’s data centers. Here’s the new
equation: CADE
= facility efficiency (FE) x asset efficiency (AE) FE
= (facility energy efficiency) x (facility utilization) AE
= (IT energy efficiency) x (IT utilization) The
Uptime Institute ( www.uptimeinstitute.org) and McKinsey & Co.
(www.mckinsey.com) first introduced CADE in a joint report that
proposed the metric as a single key performance indicator used to
compare the energy consumption of one data center against another.
CADE combines measurements of the energy efficiency of both the
facility and the IT equipment into a single factor. A higher CADE
measurement indicates a more energy efficient data
center. Steven
A. Monforton, RCDD/NTS, vice president, Technology Consulting
Engineering, Environmental Systems Design, has over 25 years of
experience in all aspects of technology infrastructure applications
from manufacturing and industrial to commercial and data
centers.
|