|
|
|
Letters
|  |
Data Center Hot Spots
Dear
Editor:
I
could not be more opposed to Chris Escher’s letter in your May/June
issue. Having worked and lived in California from 1990 until 2005, it
is the worst place to operate a business and to live. Things have
gotten so bad, that California is now rated as the 51st place that
anyone would want to start a business. The personal and corporate tax
rate is high and will get higher. California’s government prevents
any innovation, and their regulations add cost to everything. What
guarantee does he have that SMUD will have any more power available
to sell to his site?
|
|
Data Center Hot Spots
Dear
Editor:
I
read (and enjoyed) Dennis Cronin’s “Data Center Hot Spots”
column in Mission Critical
(Mar/April, p. 10). I wanted to share what I think is the next hot
spot — Sacramento, CA. Our company, Advanced Data Centers
(www.adatacenters.com) chose this location, specifically McClellan
Park, for the reasons listed below:
|
|
Reducing the Cost of Data Center Cooling
Dear
Editor:
The
1,000-kilowatt (284 ton) system Graham Whitmore describes (Reducing
the Cost of Data Center Cooling, Nov./Dec., p. 27) article cools a
relatively small data storage system. Air-cooled chillers are often
most economical for systems of this size.
|
|
LETTERS
Dear Editor:
Dennis Cronin asks if monitoring is worth it. (Summer 2008).
|
|
| <<First | <Previous | 1 | Next> | Last>> |
|
| |
|
|
|
