Protecting Mission Critical Electronics in the Industrial Environment
by Paul Haake
February 1, 2010
Electronics must be protected in harsh environments.
Today’s
engineers are designing more sophisticated control systems that bring
higher productivity to meet ever-increasing expectations of
performance in industrial settings—all while keeping system costs
under control. In order to achieve these results, they are employing
more electronics, much of it adapted from non-industrial applications
and almost all more sensitive to electrical disturbances than the
equipment being replaced. Putting this
sensitive equipment into the inherently poor power environment of an
industrial facility and aging power generation and distribution
facilities—both inside and outside of the plant—produces a wide
variety of power and electrical noise problems.
Understanding these problems, along with some
of their causes and solutions, can help ensure the design of
mission-critical electronic systems that are both reliable and
cost-effective. The first task in protecting
mission-critical elements is identification. While each system is
unique, mission-critical components are usually easily recognizable.
If they fail, customer displeasure, increased labor, or increased
material cost result. A component is mission critical if its downtime
causes lost profits. Next comes determining
the necessary level of protection.
- The
first level of protection is a defense against instantaneous
destruction of critical equipment. It’s really just enough
protection to keep things from catastrophically failing.
- The second level provides additional
protection against long-term degradation of equipment often seen in
semiconductor devices.
- The third level
adds defense against unexplained soft failures, system lock-ups, and
resets for which no specific cause can be identified. Most industrial
systems need this protection.
If satisfied
customers and controlled costs are of primary importance, systems
must be protected to the highest level; each input and output line,
whether power or data, must be examined and protected against
hazards. Such protection requires industrial-grade components, along
with devices such as surge protectors, power conditioners,
power-conditioned UPS, as well as appropriate grounding
techniques. Power Line Issues Events
that can destroy, degrade, or disrupt mission-critical equipment
include power line problems that can originate either inside or
outside the industrial facility. Outside events are the most obvious
and spectacular; however, in industrial facilities up to 80 percent
of power problems originate on the customer’s side of the meter.
Factors
such as stopping and starting motors, welding equipment, electronic
motor speed controls, poor grounding, and some of the same problems
facing the utility company—fault clearing and capacitor switching —
can all cause inside power line problems.
Among
the most noticeable power quality problems is a power interruption.
Interruptions are relatively infrequent but also dramatic and obvious
as operations grind to a halt. Alternate power feeds, local backup
generating (diesel or gas-powered generators), and UPSs on selected
equipment can prevent most work interruptions from power outages.
Voltage sags are the most measured power line
problem. The practical approach for protecting controllers against
sags is a voltage control device in the power path supplying the
control system. Device choices include those that store energy in a
transformer (constant voltage transformer), devices that use boost
windings to raise voltages during sags (tap switching transformer),
and devices that supply energy from batteries during sags (UPS).
There are also devices that use combinations of these technologies.
In the past, a constant voltage transformer
(CVT) controlled sags. Today, however, control systems have changed.
Loads are typically switch-mode power supplies (SMPS), and sags,
particularly with deregulation, are likely to become more severe. In
addition, control systems are often no longer based on proprietary
software that crashes well but on commercially available operating
systems that need to be properly shut down to start-up smoothly. Load
requirements also change more often as control schemes are frequently
updated with the latest technology.
While
changes have been made in CVTs to adapt to new technology, the best
solution is one specifically designed to support SMPS and has more
energy to ride through severe sags, such as a UPS with integral
isolation transformer that provides robust regulation, isolation, and
backup. If an isolation transformer exists in the power path near the
load, a double-conversion UPS also serves effectively.
Transient
voltages too weak to cause massive destruction are difficult to
measure. These include high-speed transients that disrupt electronic
equipment. To further complicate the situation, transients often
occur randomly. Special power quality monitors are required to
capture the high-speed impulse and oscillatory events that disrupt
sensitive electronics. This “least measured” power quality event
can be a major contributor to random errors and lock-ups that occur
in a system. Thankfully, electronic equipment
ignores most transient events. If it did not, it would be impossible
to run a computer. In mission-critical applications, however, the
goal is to push disruptions as close to zero as possible. Reducing
the amplitude and edge speed of transients becomes paramount in
achieving this desired system reliability. In order to understand the
methods that are used to control amplitude and edge speed of
transient voltages, it is useful to know how transient noise appears
to electronic equipment. Normal-mode noise
transients appear between the line (hot or phase) and neutral
conductors supplying the equipment. While somewhat troublesome, this
noise can often be controlled by combining transient voltage surge
suppressor (TVSS) devices and filters. Typically, individual
equipment includes provisions for controlling this noise
mode. Common-mode noise is far more difficult
to control. This noise appears between the neutral line and the
ground line connected to the equipment. While the neutral and common
are bonded either at the service entrance or at an intermediate
transformer, noise in this mode is quite common and very disruptive.
It typically occurs when current is dumped into the ground lead by
other equipment—input and output filters to suppress high frequency
line noise are a typical cause — as are protective devices such as
TVSSs. Control of common-mode noise requires
a transformer-based conditioning device. This provides a separately
derived source of power in which the neutral and ground wires are
locally rebonded. Almost all such commercial power-conditioning
devices also include components to control normal-mode noise. These
devices are typically available as traditional power conditioners or
as power conditioners with battery backup.
Communication Line Issues
Control
systems use communication lines for several purposes. These include
control busses (DeviceNet or Profibus), data lines to peripheral
devices such as Human Machine Interfaces (HMIs), and connections to
plant-wide information systems. While not subject to all of the
problems of power lines, communication lines are more likely to cause
system disruption due to transients. In addition, grounded
(non-isolated) communication schemes such as RS232 and RS485, provide
an additional path of disruption known as ground skew.
In
communication lines, a communication line protector (CLP) best
minimizes the chance of destruction or degradation. The clamping
voltage must be lower than the point at which damage will occur, but
higher than the maximum voltage that can be applied to the line for
normal communication. In addition, for systems with higher
transmission speeds, the insertion loss due to the added capacitance
and inductance should not cause unacceptable signal level
reductions.
External CLPs are often suggested
to improve system reliability, even if a communication port is
internally protected by a TVSS against overvoltage. This can lead to
improved reliability since a typical CLP will have a grounding lead
that can be wired to direct transient noise away from the chassis
ground of the control device. This approach avoids introducing
potentially disruptive common-mode noise into the equipment, a
situation that can occur if the internal TVSS is triggered.
While CLPs can provide protection against
system destruction and degradation, they do little to assist in
reducing disruptions from transient voltages that are below the level
of component destruction, but above the disruptive level that
interferes with routine communication. Protection against such
disruption can be addressed in several ways.
It
is critical that system grounding follows good practice and meets the
equipment manufacturers’ guidelines. With grounded communication
schemes in particular, a small grounding problem can lead to very
inconsistent communication.
In grounded
communication systems, the primary connection is the power ground,
while the second ground lead is the shield or common lead in the
communication cable. When ground currents flow in the power ground,
they cause a voltage difference known or “ground voltage skew”
between the two locations, thus causing a voltage differential to be
reflected in the communication cable. This differential and the
resultant current flow in the communication cable can cause serious
disruption of the communication path and may destroy devices not
protected by a CLP.
The most cost-effective
and reliable solution to ground skew-induced problems is a ground
skew protective device in the power path. The device works on the
principle of creating high impedance in the ground path at high
frequencies while maintaining a zero or low impedance at power-line
frequencies.
Increasing the high-frequency
impedance in the ground line substantially reduces the resultant
voltage produced by high-frequency ground currents, thereby reducing
the opportunity for disruption or destruction of the communication
line. One ground skew device should be placed in the power path of
each device containing a grounded communication port.
Conclusion
Providing
the highest level of reliability in a mission-critical industrial
system requires two steps. First, designers should employ robust
equipment made for use in industrial environments. And they should
provide total protection on power and communication
ports.
Total protection means that every power
and communication port in a system be protected and that its
grounding scheme is in accordance with NEC and manufacturers’
guidelines. Power ports should be protected with low-impedance
transformer-based power conditioners to control both common and
normal-mode noise. On some power ports a low-impedance
transformer-based power conditioner with batteries (UPS) will provide
protection against extended sags and outages when controllers must be
shut down in an orderly fashion.
Once a system
is properly installed and protected, vigilance is required to
maintain the level of integrity that was originally designed in. One
single “on the fly” addition or change can leave a system with an
unprotected path, and subject to the disruptive effects of power and
communication line anomalies.
|